Книга - World under clowns

World under clowns. Before the nuclear conflict
Almaz Braev


When I look at these clowns, I think I’m watching a child’s game, imitating adults. Here some teenagers are trying to solve adult problems. They have silly young faces. How did they get to such a height? This is a democracy, baby. In a democracy, they love the funny, naive, stupid, and entertaining crowd. Democracy is the excited self-esteem of billions of people. This excited self-esteem places in all places an obvious sweet mediocrity, or the most harmless and sick old age.





World under clowns

Before the nuclear conflict



Almaz Braev



© Almaz Braev, 2024



ISBN 978-5-0059-0141-5

Created with Ridero smart publishing system




Introduction


Famous director Ridley Scott very accurately remarked after the box office fiasco of his film The Last Duel: “I think what it boils down to – what we’ve got today [are] the audiences who were brought up on these f***ing cell phones. The millennials never want to be taught anything unless they are told it on the cell phone”.



Ridley Scott is, of course, a monster of Hollywood directing; well, what do we care about the crisis of American cinema? However, we still have a case. Ignoring and even rejecting any classical, therefore, traditional direction at the same time is already a total crisis of world culture. Where is that audience increasing if the mass show industry loses an audience?



Previously, the classics of literature owned the minds of the planet. Today, clowns are on the mind of the planet. It is unnecessary to compare how much airtime is spent on all kinds of humorous shows today, and humor is in the price. The planet entertains itself as best it can. In addition, the entertainment world is supported by big business and, therefore, by politicians. Politicians worldwide got so carried away by populism that they became clowns. No, they have not yet appeared all in a row as clowns, although in some places, clowns took power. And this is not the limit of humor possibilities for the future. Literally, all politicians in the world are engaged in the hype, and they want to look like their own among their own. Diplomatic departments are overflowing with all kinds of talkers, although the language of diplomacy has always been specific and conservative. Now, because of technological capabilities, everything has become possible. And already diplomats hype, the highest politicians hype – not lag behind. They say they will push the nuclear button if necessary. When was this possible? Baby, this is democracy! Each politician will then refer to his popularity on social networks.

This book considers not only democracy as a stage for presidents – future clowns. If world politicians come to power after social networks to entertain and please again for five minutes, then politics will disappear as an activity. Only the politicians – clowns will remain. The planet has such a prospect because of the dominance of populism. In other respects, democracy has always been distinguished by flirting with voters since Ancient Athens. Today, technology allows politicians to make noise and be publicly rowdy so that they are watched more, for they are watched more and chosen faster.

In addition to the degradation of the profession of politicians, this book will show the degradation of authoritarianism. All monarchies, then the autocracy of the world, have always had and will have a request for stupid executive officials. Moreover, all officials of such regimes have never had leadership qualities; even in the USSR, they were recruited to power not by talents but by inoffensiveness. Empire versus nature? Yes, empires overflowed with weak officials who made careers for minor services to dictators during the decline. All empires inevitably ended because they lacked heroes, but thieves and corrupt officials were always abundant.

With such a joint degradation, the two main systems of the world have come to this point in time.

We started talking about cinema in 2006; the American film company 20th Century Fox made the comedy Idiocracy.

I also advise you to watch this comedy, for there is a joke in every joke. In 2022, the world will be several years closer to its future. However, in 2006, no real clown had power yet. It was just the beginning.




Chapter 1





People want to laugh all the time


“I propose to raise a revolution against the lie that the majority has a monopoly on the truth”.



Henrik Ibsen



“We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.”

– Aesop


They say that this world appeared thanks to the explosion. In a few billion years, this world will disappear thanks to laughter. The laughter of all humankind will be so strong that the planet will not stand it and will be flooded with nuclear laughter.



Moreover, humanity will laugh heartily five minutes before the launch of ballistic missiles when the clown rulers jokingly press the button in the last reprise, which can still make people laugh. People will have no more reason to laugh because they will be under the impression of the next planetary news as stoned with marijuana. Nothing will cling to humanity anymore: neither grief, suffering, people’s troubles, nor even pornography as a manifestation of the very interesting instincts. Just laughter. And only laughter. As a forerunner of such a scenario, the appearance of clown presidents worldwide.



Someone says that clowns are given to people by world mafiosi. It benefits them that nations laugh during the pandemic. In fact, it is. But haven’t people wanted to see a funny freak for all the past ages? It also distracted them from their worries and mental problems. It’s better to see the freak and calm yourself down. Not everything is supposedly so bad. “O.K. Here he is, a freak, making me laugh; he’s funny, pathetic, and wants to make me laugh. And it’s funny to me, I feel good”. Where did all these political puppets come from now? They even declare they are ready to press the nuclear button. Why are they saying this? To make you laugh? No. Bye, to like. Politicians and diplomats of the past centuries are all boring and speak an incomprehensible professional language. And modern politics speak like real clowns. They want to please you and me. Let’s elect such politicians as presidents! It will be fun and pleasant for us.



I did not draw the appearance of clowns as a conspiracy of world elites who need clowns as presidents. I drew that clowns are the evolutionary need of the crowd of all time and people to laugh and forget their problems by observing a freak. Yes, rulers have used spectacles to distract the crowd from economic problems and political crises since the time of Rome. But what kind of crisis are we talking about with the triumph of democracy? No, there is no crisis. There is a need for people for drugs. And laughter is a very good drug. Presidents clowns want to please the crowd and its passions, so they try. What can there be anything else under a democracy?




Chapter 2





There are other situations


People need heroes only for the pain of death. During a democracy, all of humanity is moving towards the abyss to get smarter through war.



Does modern humanity resemble a dinosaur?



The main problem of modern humanity is the fear of leaders. Modern humanity agrees with the official government because it cannot do anything against it. And vice versa, no current government can ban or ignore these social networks. Social networks show a massive choice of buffoons, clowns, comedians, at the very least, dogs and cats, based on which the choice of helpless old men and other inarticulate leaders is made “with the help of democracy” – as we see, the current political bohemia and the world behind the scenes enjoy, and the fear of the crowd in front of real, natural leaders and itself already consists of such people.



Such a state of fear of the crowd in front of a man with a hard male character, each of whom causes envy and complexity of the electorate itself at the same time (social networks are an excellent slice of envy and complexes), gives an outlet to all sorts of scammers, hypocrites, spineless conformists, that is, populists who even outwardly look miserable, but do not cause envy and complexes at the moment of their screams. Populists, like the flesh and blood of a complex inert crowd, “their guys,” are taking great advantage of the situation. The crowd enjoys the audacity of an active crook, and it turns out to be self-satisfaction, another show of a political clown now.



Is it possible to blame a crowd of small, squeezed shell people in the current clowning, balancing at the moment on the brink of nuclear war, as the last show? Yes, it is possible and necessary. But first of all, you need to know that this is a democracy. Little people really want to see a show relaxing their self-esteem; the dinosaur of humanity turns out to have a very small head, and a huge body falls into the abyss when the dinosaur’s head chews a fern leaf.



Zerots men are not afraid of death, and they are afraid of shame.



Like aristocrats from the past, they don’t want to change.



So why does the traditional elite, the elite of the tribe, or the elite of the feudal lords – the Zerots – not want to change?



Actually, why should they change if that’s what you want?



The Zerots are not just unwilling to change; they are simply not trifles on the example of the clowns of democracy, to which everyone is accustomed. Modern people do not think strategically, do not plan, and do not anticipate fate for years before; they would like to live today’s day to the end and have fun, and Zerot is not; they would not. The Zerots don’t care about modern dance. They live like the characters of the Bible. They don’t just live for a few centuries – it doesn’t happen that way. That’s about how all the feudal lords of the nobility think. Zerots rule and change places only when the time is right. When sons grow up, the replacement will mature. And this replacement is their children. If not their sons, then the most worthy of the relatives change the ruler. Everything else is the whim of idiots who are used to living with the main characters all their lives in one movie session. And the crisis also plays on the desire to change the rulers. And again, only the selfishness of consumers generates a desire for the manager to leave. But he’s not leaving. Not because he is waiting for the next election. If he is a Zerot man, he is preparing a replacement for himself because the traditional elite has never consulted with the rabble. Only in very wild times, when anyone could reach the leader, would the leader yield. Well, then, not everyone would dare to take responsibility for the people’s lives. The elite is the elite. While some just live and perform the function of life from birth to old age, others are already waiting for death. Yes, the rabble is afraid of death, but Zerot is preparing for it. Zerot cares what they say about him. The Zerots inherit only their name and honor.



They behave as if they were born a long time ago.



And if a crisis has happened, what does it mean for Zerot men? Let’s get rid of our problems a little bit.



What is a crisis of tradition in general, and how does a crisis of tradition differ from a market one?



That’s just the mechanism or reasons for the replacement that will show all the differences between traditional thinking and consumer uniform.



For traditional peoples, a crisis or, more precisely, force majeure is when circumstances threaten life. And what threatens the fate or the prospect of living as always? It is as if some disaster has struck if the people do not get what they need to complete the annual cycle. And what made it possible to complete the annual cycle? These are, of course, edibles. Primitive technology and dependence on nature forced us to narrow it down. And first of all, they do not reproduce. If the farmers could afford to sit still, then the nomads were driven by the lack of food wherever they looked. If all the weak and sick died, would the leader be responsible for these losses?



Only a modern fool would come up with such an idea. No natural cataclysm would damage his authority. The first thought of primitive people is that it’s a common punishment. Supernatural strength of God. But here, the leader is not responsible for communicating with an unknown force. The time of such a crisis is the appearance of a priest on the stage. In modern terms, let’s say the Prime minister. His servants have not given something to the spirits or God. If we talk about the past, the primitive leaders of the past or leaders were responsible for defense or attack. If he is a farmer and a leader of farmers, then for defense; if he is a nomad, then for the attack. That’s what a traditional force majeure is! Only the failure of a military campaign (foreign policy in modern terms means) or even death causes rotation among the Zerot leaders. One by one, the young replace the old – change the old one or the loser or the deceased. If he loses, he is a coward; if he wins, he is a hero. And glory to him!



That is, every crisis, in modern economic terms, is the beginning of the movement of the elite in any direction. If the elite was nomadic in the past, it attacked; if it was agricultural, it held the defense. In the modern case of universalism, the crisis is overcome systematically – both by the defense (against sanctions) and attack (by an active foreign policy when much shit is in your camp). And even despite the general system and the surrounding universalism, Zerots are not chosen from the crowd by the so-called democratic elections; such elections cause only a lot of noise and confusion from their environment. Even modern oligarchs, for whom, it would seem, the gods are money, behave as if they were born under ancient feudalism because they were born in a traditional world and to a conservative culture; only after that did they become rich.




Chapter 3





The last battle. Smart vs. Traditional


The whole recent history of the world is the story of the confrontation of the smart against the traditional. Today, this confrontation is most acute and relevant. The clever Refags of the West are gaining the upper hand. Traditional communities will have no choice but crypto fascism, although fascism was not formed everywhere in Asia and did not even have such an opportunity. In Asia, fascism and communism converged in the face of traditional communities that did not clearly understand either the concept of a nation or the concept of communism. According to Marxism, the similarity turned out only in the form of terror of the poor against the rich. But, once again, Marxism or crypto-Marxism prevailed because market relations were poorly developed, nations were not formed, and peoples did not turn into one whole and in one form. Even today, Chinese communism or Korean more closely resemble feudal regimes with their ethnic specifics – an ancient culture based on an industrial revolution. Coups seem to have happened, modernization has taken place, and there has been stagnation in reflection. Reflection remained the same. From the tadpole of the collectivist, a master frog can always appear. The regimes will always be teetering on the brink of restoration according to the type of Russia. Because in Asia, traditional community members have put individuals under control, the Zerefs have prevailed over the smart ones. They prevailed physically – as always – with quantity and traditional morality. But who are the smart ones? How is this confrontation understood through reflection?



Smart.



In the manner of Western superiority, today, they are called personalities. Western reformers successfully introduced a culture of tolerance in the fledgling national capitalism. If savages do not appreciate and cannot appreciate talents until they feel the need, then let them learn to endure. Thus, the savages, because of an inferiority complex, learn tolerance and call each other personalities now. Although the traditionalists always have superiority in the first place locally. The new feudal elite and everyone with enough money feels good but are not yet individuals. They repeat that they love democracy and strive for it, but most of all, they are consumers, including words from smart Westerners who are honorary teachers for the Zerefs (for modern traditional people).



However, this does not mean that the past traditionalists have disappeared somewhere, disappeared among the personalities of corrupt officials, artists, comedians, millionaire athletes, and other propagandists of legislators. All those who did not fall into the categories of personalities held an act of revenge. The Zerefs don’t care what to call the smart ones – the main ones are their next upstarts. In the traditional world, there have never been personalities in the Western manner of sensuality. The traditionalists have all personalities – folk heroes. But the Zerefs still call everyone they don’t love one word – parasites and also “enemies of the people” and other enemies, as it has always been. The Zerefs have never distinguished the political sides of the smart ones. They despise the right under the name of liberals and the left under the name of Trotskyists. But, once again, who is it – a liberal that a Trotskyist does not matter to the Zerefs; for the traditionalists, it is the same thing because both of them – liberal and Trotskyist have broken away from the people. They think – the Zerefs are sure that they are better than everyone, better “the enemies of people” simply by the type of abilities and what abilities are unimportant. Smart versus traditional, a new round of confrontation begins.




Chapter 4





They will do everything themselves


But the Zerefs don’t want to tolerate each other. To understand this and the mechanism of manipulation of Zeref weaknesses, you need to go back and see the roots of Zeref intolerance in the past.



Zerefs, are relatives; relatives are quite tolerant. The Zerefs are intolerant only to strangers, not to their own, who are not relatives to them. For their own, they are more than friendly; they are obliged to help each other to survive, if anything, to stand up for their kind – they are sacrificial. Moreover, they are connected by blood ties with each other.



But why are the Zerefs suddenly changing?



Maybe because strangers have penetrated their family circle? Exactly. As soon as the foreigners enter the village, they immediately strain the Zerefs. Nature has made it so that no one can break the bonds of kinship. Strangers can infiltrate or disturb neighbors if only the population has increased, extra people of a neighboring tribe have found themselves on the border, and maybe even the aggressors have come specifically for the purpose of capture. In revcon, overpopulation is called a Zeref loop. Tradition sets the only task for the male half of humanity. Every Zeref is obliged to continue his family. Fulfilling this divine commandment (to be fruitful and multiply), Zeref is the founder of the genus. And when each of his last children does the same, a clash between the increased number of births is inevitable. It won’t happen right away. Maybe it will take centuries. But sooner or later, one tribe will attack another. The most primitive illustration of such a clash is the Great Migration of peoples in the IV century. The overpopulation of traditional population areas is the source of zero tolerance. This intolerance does not depend on time. It is always there as long as there is a tradition. As long as there is at least one traditional person. Of course, technical achievements do not prevent these collisions. If there is no change in morals, the Zerefs remain intolerant pagans; the first thing they will do is attack. If morality is subjected to a decrease in kinship, a decrease in the importance and role of blood, then the Zerefs are subjected to great embarrassment. With the arrival of the prophet of enlightenment, they seem to meet their own mirror. Not all Zerefs accept it, agree, and get down. Most protest and disagree. The fate of all the saints, in this case, is predetermined. Zerefs don’t like to look at themselves in the mirror. The Zerefs love it when someone praises them. (This childhood habit is so tenacious that the traditional upbringing is the key to understanding such a phenomenon of modernity as nationalism). If the attempt at enlightenment or the transition to a new reflection is delayed, then a false prophet, or the most agile group of greedy and cunning populists, necessarily replaces the prophet in the main square. This fanatic does not differ at all from his primitive prototype. Let them be separated by centuries, but before you – all the same, Zeref is a relative. He is, of course, also irreconcilable with outsiders. He certainly says that the precepts of antiquity and the parting words of the ancestors remain the most important for his people. The ancestors also said, listening to real prophets’ notifications, – be fruitful and multiply! If the populist Zeref did not accept the moral precepts of the reformation, he would guide the crowd according to even older precepts. In general, the conflict of morality leads to a collision. And then all the moralists who have met another overpopulation – a zeref loop, are subject to obstruction. If you want to know why the false prophets are directing the crowd at the old moralists (or intellectuals and other clever people), they get rid of competitors. The time of the zeref loop immediately revives the Remid one. What is a remide loop? It is when the simplest one stands out from the group of worthy ones (from the existing, acting elite). This most primitive does not look like either the former aristocracy or the false populist from the square; he is nobody at all. But all likely applicants like him precisely because of his insignificance. The time of the zeref loop or the overflow of borders by the people creates pressure on the elite, and it also degrades along with the people. The elite’s Remids squeeze out a gray mouse from their environment to the surface – the worst of the brilliant ranks, just because it’s time for physical overflow. Highlighting the worst is a reaction and, simultaneously, a signal to attack. The Zeref loop is not only a time of economic crisis but also a time of growth of contenders for power. Because everyone wants to be an elite, to be in the upper strata, the current morality disappears. From this, the worst and the insignificant change places with the best and the noble; the lower ones turn into the upper ones (not all, of course, as this is physically impossible), and the upper ones go down. The philistine, the ordinary philistine, immediately complains that everything human is disappearing. People turn into antipodes. There is no solidarity, former union, or corporatism, only lies, deception, cunningness, adaptability, and even violence – the peak of the Zeref celebration and redistribution. This gives a signal that in a pre-cultural world, a primitive movement is coming. It was as if strangers had come, and all the people had rebelled against this coming. As usual, this phenomenon is called fascism now. Almost the nation welcomes self-praise and the likely seizure of someone else’s territory. But the most important thing is not the overflow of people, not the crisis of extra mouths, and therefore, extra people who cannot be fed – this is the growth in the number of candidates for power. The physical growth of not the people but the applicants. When there are many applicants and the base is old, morality turns from human into hateful; morality turns into anti-morality, and everyone wants to rise at the expense of humiliating others. And these heads, on which all the applicants want to walk, are not necessarily representatives of other ethnic groups (clans). If there are many applicants but few places, a signal is received – the morality does not correspond to the moment, then all the applicants want their people. To untie their hands, the applicants begin to denounce competitors and immediately find enemies, and it is better, of course, to have obvious enemies and, at the same time, praise the crowd, asserting that it should live better. There are always a lot of applicants in chaos and turmoil. People say adventurers want to fish in muddy water. Of course, with the old morality and with the old elite, it is impossible to catch fish in any way. That is why the old elite if not physically destroyed, is completely vulgarized. She sinks to the bottom, beggars. Every bearer of the morality of solidarity and responsibility, or who simply remembers what it is, for example, the same teachers in schools, is subjected to humiliation and direct and indirect ridicule. Suppose the applicant or his philistine ally wants to rise in the new hierarchy of timelessness. In that case, they must trample morality, honor, responsibility, and the memory of when it was. Humiliate anyone who remembers anything at all..



Thus, it is not a zeref loop or overpopulation that is the cause of the crisis. The cause of the crisis is not necessarily economic; the devastation first occurs in the heads, and then in the economy, it is the old morality. It did not take into account the factor of the new elite. The overflow is not of the population but of new contenders for power and influence.



The appearance of a large crowd of potential applicants at the gates of the old guard. This moment has been missed. The uprising begins. The new elite is first encroaching on the old morality because it stands guard over the alleged humanity and, in fact, the interests of the old elite. The old elite is overthrown along with the old morality. Among the omitted or deposed carriers of humanity, the layman sees not the humane elitists of the past, who were just hypocritical to come to power in turn, but.. teachers, ordinary schoolteachers, and all others who have the concept of honor and decency. There should be no such people for a crowd of applicants to rule.

The new contenders are not the creators of a new morality but only the Zeref destroyers (destroyers of traditions). They do not care, as well as primitive barbarians, whether the city, this state or not, will remain after the capture and plunder. This zero-tolerance can unite the people with the new elite of the future. Such an elite needs to give as much freedom as possible. It is destroying old bonds, and they can’t think of anything but solidarity through blood. And what do the relatives of the whole world do? They are waiting for what to take and where to attack. But even to attack, you need an organization higher than clan solidarity. Therefore, all traditional elites are primarily engaged in humiliating their people. It’s good for the West on its part to manipulate them with this kind of traditional elite. All actions are calculated.




Chapter 5





The people who look back


The people who remember their families and tribes constantly talk not about the future but about their past. It is how it happens at ceremonies – weddings, funerals, especially at funeral rites. The most important actors there are old people.



So what is democracy for, you say? What place should I attach it to the past people’s story? The people look at the elderly as intellectuals and legislators of behavior. It would seem that no reforms can break through such a people; the real subconscious revolves around the spirits of the dead. Such a person himself wants to be liked by the spirits of the departed (they “returned”, as the Kazakhs say about the dead, that is, about a dead person, because all this time they seemed to be returning to the real world to help living relatives).



So why do we need democracy, which does not exist? After all, there really isn’t. It just sounds like fashion. It is fashionable to say so, pretend to adapt to the world information, and hence culture. Talking about democracy to a Kazakh means showing that you know world affairs. You are so aware that you are such an honorable person. It is a show-off, as the Kazakhs themselves say about it. At the ceremonies, no one talks about democracy because of the senselessness of showing off in the wrong place. You can show off clothes, an expensive car, and verbal symbols that do not require sounds or words, and everyone immediately understands why this Kazakh came. Of course, he will also listen to old people and recognize relatives, and he can’t get away from relatives anywhere. Therefore, no new or old ideology will be able to do anything with the tribal world; it is so strong and cohesive. And the people will inevitably go back, begin to degrade, and get rid of civilization, although even at this time, there will be attempts to show that you are higher than others. I once said that the Russian language is an attempt by Kazakhs to show their independence from their kind, where all the roles are already painted, and everyone knows who will do what, including who will come to the funeral and what will tell. Of course, the Russian-speaking Kazakh does not think about it at all. But he knows that with Russian (today with English and Spanish), he can show his level and raise his status. The tribal elite has always been the fastest to adopt the culture, hence the speech of the colonizers. Russian Russians also spoke French until the Russian Revolution and the British Celts quickly Romanized. Hence, the Indian elite spoke Spanish, English, and French, so even the Russian nobles spoke French until the Russian Revolution. If the peasants could speak the language of a people they had not even seen, they would not speak. But Kazakhs began to speak Russian; first, the generic outcasts could not roam with the family. They didn’t even have a horse. But they quickly compensated for their shortcomings by learning Russian in the city.




Chapter 6





The Modern Warrior


Among those who found themselves outside the circle of the chosen Zerots (feudal elite), among even the so-called middle stratum and just ordinary people, we know there were the real outcasts. But it is not given to be brave warriors, and not everyone is lucky to appear in a family of feudal authority. Even in the family of noble feudal lords, incidents can happen. For example, the story of Gautama Buddha happened. From this, the Buddha was even an outcast for a while.

On the contrary, he became a prophet for the whole of Southeast Asia. Not everything is given to turn into a Buddha. But among those who were outside the circle of traditional people, there were people very similar to the Buddha or potential Buddhas. This is not a mockery! All the outcasts of the traditional world who found themselves outside the circle of prestige are very similar; on the periphery, all the Mangurts seem to be the same person. I didn’t misspeak. Mangurts and renegades, losers, and rootless people could be very interesting people from the position of self-reflection. We know that the Zerefs have no reflection. It is almost zero, hence the naming under the status of Zeref. Zeref – reflection means zero. Or almost zero. The Zerefs live in this world to perform rituals to preserve traditions, continue the ancestors’ work, and produce heirs. And, of course, to multiply the glory – your glory and the glory of your tribe. When we talk about the Zerefs, the main thing for the tradition is the physical multitude of people who make up the traditional people. The more people, the more people, men and women, have fulfilled their duty. They gave birth to children and brought them up so that they, in turn, did the same thing – gave birth to children. Nothing else is needed. Everything that goes beyond the circle of the rite and, consequently, beyond the circle of the chosen people, the elite, is the real mangurtism. Mangurt is a person who not only does not know his name – this is in a narrow sense but is someone who does not want to live in the old way.



But how will he live in the old way if all the places for climbing are occupied by the most arrogant? The bravest and the most cunning. The most respectable (in the traditional sense) and, of course, the most exemplary. Who, in general, is an example of the Zerefs? What do fathers teach their sons? You already know about the duty of raising sons. But with what mood? What is meant here is not excitement at the sight of a woman. The most important thing here is respect. Fathers teach their sons to respect rituals and, therefore, observe etiquette. Respect for elders is equal to respect for tradition and reverence for the elite. Our mangurts, losers, and renegades in this matter are the latest. No, of course, they also observe rituals, show, and don’t pretend, but they are kicked off by the strongest and the most daring. The one who portrayed virtue and generosity with pleasure a minute ago kicks the renegades. Not only the bravest and most exemplary, kick someone. For traditional people, a prerequisite is to kick someone, not necessarily with a foot but with words, intrigue, back-talking, and various gossip. So, the most exemplary sons can tell their father about the pranks of one of their family members. Then, the father punishes the unfortunate with his own hand. Do you recognize it? At the invitation of his entourage, the ruler of such a people can punish an official who is guilty of something. Maybe he didn’t even do anything. But woe to him! Whoever is closer to the ears of the father, ruler, educator, or supervisor is the most reliable. But whoever gets a kick kicks is pushed out by these kicks to the very perimeter. If the kick happened from above, then everyone can kick. Among the Mangurts, renegades, and losers, there may be very respectable people in the past, of course. But these fallen from the hill will never become Buddha. The traditional people do not like wisdom and the wise at all now. Wise for the Zerefs is an any old man. And, of course, the absolute authority of wisdom is the ruler. If there is an overlap of high position and age, then this is just cosmic luck for Zerot feudal. But again and again – woe to our Mangurts!



Suppose such people do not respect the smart. And what is smart? How can a son be smarter than his father? Unheard of impudence. The people expel such a contingent to the very periphery – these people become Mangurts. Only the poorest and ignoble, who by the will of fate find themselves outside the honorable circle of their people, study the languages of their neighbors and, of course, a craft that would be considered a despicable occupation for the worthy. For example, who would need to communicate with Russian immigrants if the whole family and all relatives have long migrated to the side of grass-rich pastures? Only outcasts who don’t have a horse have nothing to carry their yurt on. Tribal outcasts began to build stationary housing according to the type of housing they saw from the Russians to survive. And who would want to go to a Russian city if he has a lot of sheep? Only those who simply didn’t have them. But in a strange city, you can find a job. This is all an example of learning where mangurts come from. And that’s why they eventually turn out to be the most far-sighted. They are not far-sighted! Their relatives, kin, and people gave them a “kick”. This kick gave them acceleration, and then hunger did everything.



But it cannot be said that the Mangurts were the smartest because they were naturally talented. Gifted mangurts. That’s not so. There are plenty of talented sons among the family’s authoritative people, the people in the circle of honor. But the thing is that these talents diligently perform only rituals and continue the age-old inertia; that is, they live in the old way. The whole talent of the Zerefs is to have a lot of wealth. So that everyone knows about it, it was possible to show sheep, horses – fat family herds in the past. And you can show your elite housing, many floors, bank cards – this is today. It is necessary to show this to re-enter the circle of traditional honor. When the Zerefs meet on holidays or at a wake, they are sure to boast. They want to show their level, achievements, where they live, and where the children study. What connections? What prospects? But how did these former nomads get into another circle of honor? How did you end up on another level of civilization? Without forgetting to praise your achievements as if nothing had changed or time had stopped. Nothing has changed!



The fact is that disrespect for Zelots (for super people, for zelots, for people of honor and nobility) is a traditional rule. So they lived for centuries. Smart, and in modern terms, means civilized on the traditional scale and, according to the school of military democracy, means weak. It shows everyone that this person is weak. No one needs it. Zerefs by exemplary behavior: show – off is, of course, hypocrisy is common – by guile, arrogance, greed, and pressure, they still climb into the honorary circle. They still want to show that they are higher and have great achievements. What achievements? It’s not hard to guess here. According to the laws of military democracy, selecting an “exemplary” element goes to the very top. These people don’t have to think like Mangurts. They are obliged to provide for their family like 100 or 200 years ago. All the people are busy with such provisions. They all got so carried away with this business that they didn’t even have an intelligentsia. And who is this intelligentsia? These are the very people who cannot roam with their families, and they simply do not have a horse now. And that’s a shame! This is no good. An intellectual, a mangurt, a scientist is not a warrior. Point. The modern warrior is making a fortune. This is not corruption in the traditional sense. These are trophies.



How did it happen that these people turned out to have lived up to market relations but continued to live by the old rules? All these changes in people happen by accident. The people didn’t even understand what had happened. And if I didn’t understand, then I didn’t need to.



For example, if there is a sharp change, people immediately switch from cattle breeding to market relations. But they again weed out from his environment the smart but weak, or the poor but noble – I don’t know, both qualities are shameful here, so all the changes that have occurred have suddenly occurred. No one was preparing for them. And why? The main thing is to show again that you are no worse, no weaker than the most arrogant.




Chapter 7





How Asians turn into personalities


There has never been such a thing in the East. There has always been a hierarchy in the East. No personalities. The very concept of personality is a bourgeois invention. The rootless bourgeois invented their personality so that the feudal elite would understand who they were dealing with. From now on, it means we did not with despicable philistines but with worthy people. Bourgeois personalities exuded an elitist informality. Formally, they were despicable people in the feudal report card; in fact, informally, the bourgeoisie had the meaning of a new rank. With a fierce desire to prove the opposite, this suspended state or formal insignificance manifested itself in the soreness or vulnerability bankers constantly carried with them. Today, when the “personalities” of the conditional East or all former citizens of the former USSR talk about personality and rights, they certainly do not know what it cost Western personalities, how many generations of Europeans and Americans have gone through the market test. Even what passed to the East as remnants of Western dignity after the fall of totalitarianism does not convey the torment that future rootless bankers once experienced. But that energy of humiliation and overcoming humiliation was still transmitted. I don’t know how; rather, by genetic memory, the memory of humiliation turned into reflexes of resistance. Eastern people who had never lived in the market, in any case, had not reached the moment of the triumph of bourgeois law according to the type of the Napoleonic code, did not understand and could not understand Western protests. But they liked that they were called personalities in absentia. That’s all. And who wouldn’t like to be one? Life is bad without a loser. That’s what Oriental vanity means. Find me a man in the street who would avoid fashion. Especially if it needs very average, mediocre, ordinary money. Nobody would get the status simply. And they got it without bothering. But simply because world socialism collapsed. On the contrary, formally, everyone was equal; in fact, there is the same medieval hierarchy here. It turns out that the Western personality was born in a centuries-old market struggle; the Eastern took this victory from the Western personality. Although it seems that she also fought for her rights, but rather for status. But in the East, civil rights did not matter at all. Although even communists or people who fancied themselves radical equalizers wrote the Constitution, they wrote and changed it several times. But if no one here was really interested in rights, even with a radical equation, if communism was just a new form or kind of an old tradition, and in fact, there were elected communists of the top and all men the rest, in general, the rights remained on paper, life has shown that the one who has more is right he is right, and officials always have more rights. It is repeated in all post-Soviet states. The Western tracing paper of the confrontation of feudal lords and urban philistinism received in the East the confrontation of party bosses and ordinary Soviet people, once again, with social justice declared to the whole world. There was never any struggle in the East. Soviet citizens automatically became personalities in the Western manner, without a market and money, that is, without the banal practice of fighting for money and rights. This very lack of experience in fighting for their rights has shown that no one in the East needs rights but money. Nobody wants to be called nobody comrades, as it was in the past, and everyone wants to be a new personality. Consumer personalities. Consumers of goods, which would be even more accurate. No one wanted universal equality through consumption; Western tracing paper was taken literally at face value. In the East, another Eastern hierarchy was immediately lined up to be someone; an oligarchy appeared and immediately an elected non-judicial elite. None of the disenfranchised in the future, and constantly Eastern personalities without money, did not occur to them that this – their old culture and practice would happen again. However, still, they were seized with the hope that someone would be able to climb up into the company of the chosen ones. That means one thing. Until something like a new hierarchy is formed in the East again, everyone will be busy with their own, only their own business. But even when everyone sees or is pointed out to them, they will rather feel a new corvee themselves. But now, nothing will save the eastern losers. According to their culture, they received, were obliged to receive a new feudal elite. Does it have a different name now? Nothing. But now there is a real market. Understanding what it is like to be a disenfranchised slave in the market with arrogant, arrogant feudal lords is necessary. Do I want to say that Eastern personalities should go through the experience of Western personalities externally as it really was with the West? I’m not sure. A new world system has been formed. And the eastern oligarchy has integrated into the Western one. The fresh descendants of the rootless communists, raised from the bottom by the revolution, found mature descendants of the rootless status burghers for a union. And the Eastern people began to play by the Western rules; that is, they hoped they would be accepted into the club of the elect, in any case, all the oligarchs. Who trades is a person, isn’t it? But the oligarchs from the East were mistaken. The Western elite did not accept them as equals.



It follows that any local protest against the world mafia is simply an uprising of a medieval village against the empire. I admit that even people from the oligarchy will enter it. Those who did not fit on the new world trade Olympus. All these nationalists, patriots, Marxists with national faces, just network chatterboxes, and even protesters in the United States will achieve nothing until a new world revolution party is created.




Chapter 8





After the restaurant


Envy of a gift or talent is much stronger than envy of wealth. But the most secret hatred of nobility. Democracy shows well who is at the top, who is at the bottom, and why.

The difference between Western money and Eastern nobody.



Every nouveau riche would like to walk with chicks in a restaurant. What’s else the point of making money? It is to sit in a restaurant and take off a chick or to show off in front of a friend. There is no other meaning in general. What do these crooks, officials, bankers, and stockbrokers think about? They are certainly not thinking about restaurants and are tired of them, although where else can they go? Well, also, on yachts, on islands, go for a ride. So their media and corrupt journalists in the so-called media show how they live; therefore, everyone who penetrates the market wants only to walk and enjoy themselves like oligarchs. Even the films were made by Oligarchs, in every possible way letting romance on freedom and its meanings. Are they so-called free individuals? Yes, whoever trades and succeeds is a person. Therefore, everyone wants to be a personality in a Western manner.

Ask any student at recess what he wants and what he dreams about. Of course, he is studying not to fly into space but to become a business astronaut. Suppose businessmen fly, then only for the money, so everyone can see they took a walk in space. It certainly hurts when some people see that the rich are walking and the chicks’ eyes are burning, not on knowledge, and the young ones, of course, want to imitate rich personalities simultaneously. So that they have everything and there would be no punishment for all this.

In general, this very market competition at the output turns out to be pure distilled egoism. Of course, the world of universal festivities, show-offs, and drawing in the name of fire in chicks’ eyes pisses everyone off. Those who walk on foot are infuriated that those who do not walk live even better. And all the losers hate all these lucky ones. And they also hate all sorts of clever people, especially all sorts of moralists who could restrain this savagery, but already in the form of pathetic beggars. In general, this is a world where many egoists have access to restaurants.

It’s good that there are social networks at this moment. Where every loser, well, in what sense, in the sense of unmotivated discontent, can imagine himself as God? What do you mean by God? Well, in the sense of almost an oligarch of all sorts of creative thoughts. Well, what, I ask, are these creatives? Well, in the same case, what was already asked of the student at recess? In the world of money, everyone wants what they don’t know. But he wants, he really wants, and therefore, he hates all possible opponents, haters, and envious people. It’s good that the hater or God is still asleep. In a well-fed state, this universal negative seems to be sleeping. And therefore, he may not like what he chooses because I repeat, everyone is a god in his own right, a loner to himself, almost an oligarch. And it is impossible to gather these people about it, except in our restaurant. They will discuss each other again, who is sleeping with whom, how, and in the name of what. God forbid a furry animal named Crisis to come. That’s when all the desires will converge in one desire for someone to punish someone very much. That’s how disparate individual fascism, aka hatred, will gather at one point. Where will one person named the leader speak?




Chapter 9





Napoleon and Hitler


A salesman, a money changer, a banker, and a collective trader never commit violence. Hence, the modern so-called nonviolent war is a hybrid.



All previous wars were fought traditionally – by violence. Violence is an indicator of the traditional will. Until the world’s population totally switched to currency quotes, floating rates, bank rates, violence, and traditional methods of enslavement, in fact, conquest was standard. Conquest is always accompanied by occupation. Enemy troops occupy the lands of the defeated or leave small contingents.



But the 21st century has changed all standards. The population rejected violence. Standards of excellence and fairness have changed dramatically. Human rights are above all! Humanity has proclaimed human rights at the top of its voice and from different places.



In fact, human rights are the rights of the buyer if human rights are transferred to the universal language of banknotes. Still, for the rights of buyers, it means that the interests of sellers are behind the personalities in the language of banknotes. And these are not those medieval money changers, bankers of the early 20th century, and other people – hunters for profit. Modern Refags, we are talking about Refags; these are already tactics and strategists of bloodless occupation. Moreover, the victims of the Refags will be the entire population. But they (people) won’t even know about it. Rather, they will also want a quick and easy profit. After the occupation, the victim does not know that it has already entered the stomach. But it doesn’t happen that way. Where it arrives, it wanes.



So, Refags are people with high self-reflection. However, this self-reflection was not developed in caring about the people, the population, buyers, and others interested in getting rich quickly. This is a special self-reflection outside the clan and the people. Such reflection was developed by renegades, outside the clan, outside the people. This reflection is developed in need and not in the periphery. To find out more about this, you need to read my book Refags.



There is a traditional population.

There are even modern states with traditional people. No matter how much you dissuade them, they believe in their gods and authority. They have sacred values. They trust their rulers. And only officials are accused. They believe their tsar is not to blame. Forever. It can be called faith in the tsar father or designated, generalized by paternalism. All the traditional peoples in the revcon are summarized by the collective word – Zeref. Low self-reflection explains the belief in a ruling deity on the throne (in full power) and redemptive violence (out of power). Refazhnaya, a tradesman’s faith, relies solely on peaceful weaning methods. This is an invisible, very fun occupation. Traditional Zerefs, through purchases, sales, exchange, accumulation, theft, and corruption, can raise both their status and fortune. The trouble is that what place you occupy is important in the traditional world. There is always an elite, and there are subjects, the so-called rabble. It is enough to take, buy, sell, inspire, and love money, and the elite will sell their rabble. But the conditional rabble will give everything and sell because the rabble imitates the upper class.



If noble people remained in the elite or the rabble did not exterminate their noble elite at the root in the past, the Refags may have problems. But with the subordination of the entire planet by the Refags and the absence of another ideological alternative, there are no other values except buying and selling today.



Today, we will have to compare Napoleon and Hitler in the light of the revcon. Why is one still considered an adept of progress and the other a fiend of hell? Both attacked Russia. Russia, the Russian people, have never put money first. In any case, when Russia had tsars and nobles. Yes, Russia has always been famous for high thieves, courtiers of the highest rank, who stole heavily from the treasury. But after all, who were these people? These were the new nobles – those who were recruited from the street. If they were the majority, Napoleon would have had a great chance to take Russia without Borodin. To take Russia using the abolition of serfdom – these are all modern inventions. Russian peasants would have liked such an idea but did not know private property. Only people who would cultivate monetary relations for a long time could understand and accept Bonaparte. It is also to honor him, as the entire bourgeoisie of Europe honors him for his Code so far. Russia had serfdom with folk zeref’s self-reflection, with weak reflection; any outsider who came with the war “will die here by the sword.” Even if he had come without a war, he would not have been able to bribe the elite of Russia, and the serf slave would not give a damn about money because he didn’t know what it was. The serf did not see the money but worked out a natural corvee.



Now, let’s look at Hitler through the prism of human rights.



Here is a real Zeref’s parish. Hitler was the leader of the Zeremids, the first generation of citizens. The first generation is always the hungriest and the most greedy. Hence, the theory of Aryan superiority. Take modern social networks, teeming with petty bourgeoisie, imagining themselves. Everyone comes up with an incredible story of the superiority of his ethnic group, his people. And that means such the dreamer himself with schizo deviations. As the leader of the transitional layer, Hitler put the superiority of Germans over subhumans on the swastika flag. There was no way they could come up with non-traditional human rights. That’s why the genocide of the Germans was so radical, in fact, traditional. So did all the invaders before Hitler. However, not a single invader brought an entire theory under the genocide of underdeveloped peoples. Such a theory is possible only after poisoning by the market of many people. All Zeremids are provincial. However, it is the provincials who want quick success and quick results.




Chapter 10





“I’m not like that!”


The last politician of the XX century



Since the XVI century, the fashion for freaks has appeared in England. This fashion has emerged in conservative Britain.



In 1814, a coalition of united monarchies entered Paris. Excerpt from the work of Guy de Maupassant “Mother of Freaks” show: “I remembered this disgusting story and this disgusting woman, having recently met on a beach favored by the rich, a Parisian woman, well-known in the world, young, elegant, charming, the object of universal admiration and respect. My story is old, but such things are not forgotten…” The writer reports on an elegant and respected woman who gives birth to freaks for sale. Who is the ugly, really, woman in Parisian society?



The coalition troops of the Conservatives, of course, entered Paris. But they could not stop the development of capitalism. I am sure that the citizens of New France have always talked about democracy: you can’t put what is released from there in a cage. Even when the Bourbon monarchy was restored, the bourgeoisie was the dominant class. The proletariat will notice only thirty-year-old Karl Marx after a series of riots in France in 1848. From the Code of Napoleon (1804) to the Manifesto of Karl Marx (1847), this is not just a biological time of two generations. This is a time of rapid development of capitalism. It means passions: fears, pain, anger, and experiences, that is, all market stresses that President Putin’s contemporaries should not be introduced to.



We can say that Russia, from 1991 to 2022, went through the same “excursion” as France from the Bourbons to Louis Napoleon. Only France was preparing for total industrialization, such were the values of that time, and democratic Russia was monetizing, that is, deindustrialization, all this time (the hard coin fell into the pockets and entourage of Louis Philippe – the penultimate Bourbon on the throne, the Restoration time and corruption is very similar to modern Russia and all the regimes of the former USSR).



The behavior of Russian compradors is explained as follows: in the middle of the XIX century, there was no common market and globalism in Europe; the French oligarchs did not suffer from inferiority complexes, although they were also the offspring of peasants. Not only revolutionary France but even monarchical France have always been the trendsetters of European fashion.



But not the fashion for fools.



Since the XVI century, as was immediately noticed, the fashion for freaks appeared in England. The Komprachikoses traveled around the country and bought children from needy, declassified people to disfigure their appearance, then exposed the freaks to the crowd’s amusement. The Komprachikoses monetized, not the terrible face of the freaks. The Komprachikoses monetized the population’s need for other people’s suffering. Capitalism spreads across the territory through overwork, deprivation, tension, and over-competition. What ethical conclusion are all moralists asked to make at the sight of cripples and beggars on the street? “You could have been among them. Rejoice, you are lucky.” The Komprachikoses monetized the human passion for seeing one unfortunate freak after another through the most important passion of a man of the market – the passion for profit. The officials of Edward V began to drive the English peasants from the communal land. Hundreds of thousands of vagabonds flooded the roads and squares of England. Only the kompracicoses could compete with the vagabonds in the spectacle of suffering. Only they created their freaks t with their hands. So that tramps look at cripples and laugh: “I’m not like that!”“I’m not like what the king made from all.



Why all this digression into the past?



To demonstrate the ferocity of capitalism?



Only partially. The need to see freaks is the main ideology of the market. Officially, this is called culturally decently to democratic and liberalism. Hordes of dressed-up and official hypocrites talk about democracy at every turn. The people are ready to tolerate this and even dream of big money, so everyone will be lucky one time. Otherwise, Alexei Navalny would not have millions of small and large Democrat supporters. Nobody needs a red idea of socialism or a conservative idea. The crowds of left-wing Pharisees and talkers who chatter in response to the liberal flock about the dictatorship of the proletariat only add strength to future Komprachikoses. For the people to be silent, they must see freaks. I’m not like that! I was lucky! The presence of freaks on the official air and especially on social networks – the focus of modern anger against fencing – saves any hypocritical democracy, which cannot be anywhere in the world. But they talk about it brazenly, defiantly hypocritical, cynically. This increases the passion of the masses to see not politicians around but freaks – not just freaks, but political freaks. People are ready to laugh at the system, even looking at one clown at the very top, the leader of the parliamentary faction. This is enough to rule for a long time. One cry of the socialite Buzova into the crowd is enough: “I’m a fool!” The whole crowd will howl from self-satisfaction and stress relief. I’m not like that she! I was lucky!



The same sentiments were among Europeans, the French, and the British in the XIX century. At that time, there was no Internet, but there was a circus. All the freaks were collected and shown there. Even circus troupes of people carrying anomalies of appearance traveled across America. But everything I have described is only the beginning of the triumphal march of capitalism around the world. This is just the beginning of the freak show. At first, ordinary people, the crowd, were not lucky enough to calm down at the sight of the unfortunate. With the development of democracy in-depth, and not only in breadth but also funny politicians, it appeared over time – harbingers that there will be solid Guemplens further on Olympus. Democracy is a selective process, and it is not a choice of the best among the best. Democracy is a choice to laugh to yourself. Millions choose and take revenge at the same time. Amazingly, the manipulations of so-called dictatorships and autocracies save a country from another clown in the role of president. The fact that those who play the presidential role in the modern world are buffoons and empty seats is shown by the fight against a catastrophic treacherous virus…



And only a politician who can challenge all the freaks and all the buffoons mumbling about some kind of democracy is a real imperial politician. This is a greeting from the XVI and XVIII centuries to Russia. But how and why he became like this, even though he was chosen to be an empty place and not interfere with the enrichment of the court, is another question, another topic that requires disclosure. The last strong politicians were in Europe in the XX century. The last strong ideologues were in the world, too, in the XX century.




Chapter 11





Shorties


“People are like people. They love money, but it’s always been that humanity loves money, no matter what it’s made of, whether it’s leather, paper, bronze, or gold. Well, they are frivolous… well, well… and mercy sometimes knocks on their hearts … ordinary people… in general, they resemble the former… the housing issue only spoiled them…



M. Bulgakov “Master and Magarita”


Until about 460 BC, the Athenians did not like money. Money did not play a major role. After its victory over the Persians, Athens consolidated other Greeks around it during the conflict and headed the Delos Maritime Union of Greek cities. Over time, the union’s treasury was also moved to Athens under the pretext of better preservation of money. From that moment on, the aristocracy of Ancient Greece began to suffer damage, not in terms of loss of authority and influence; however, the aristocrats themselves became bourgeois in thirty years. Rootless oligarchs who supported the strategist Pericles appeared in Athens. To finally finish off the aristocracy, the oligarchs used the so-called “shard court” – ostracism. In just two generations, Athens got rid of outstanding citizens: Aristides, Phimistocles, Cimon, Thucydides, etc. They drove all ambitious people out of the city. Only Pericles remained.

However, the sword of the crowd hung over him in the form of ostracism. It may seem strange to refer to some Ancient Greece: where is Ancient Greece, and where is the modern world? Ancient events and modern facts are separated by 2500 years. (What are you, they say, a blockhead, carrying a blizzard. However, each material is not a fairy tale or a saying. I cannot tell white patriots and fascists that there are instructive examples and analogies. Here is the fate of the Greek Atlantis, as Ancient Greece and its democracy disappeared in the time of history). But it is precisely Greek democracy that creates a vivid example of a short – term rise and a long fall and degradation, and then complete disappearance – the oblivion of the famous ethnic group. (The Greek landing in Smyrna in May 1919 and the Second Greco-Turkish War cannot be regarded as a Greek revival. The Greeks were expelled by the Kemalists and left Asia Minor forever. However, these were completely different Greeks already. But what’s the difference? These were also considered Greeks).



For the traditional ethnos to disappear along with the de facto disappeared aristocracy (no matter what, it may even be modern and socialist), the activity of only two “market” generations is necessary. Just two. And now, one is enough. Ancient Athens, until the complete defeat of the semi-savage in the opinion of civilized and tolerant Athenians of Sparta, lived in the struggle of the ancestral aristocracy, its clans among themselves, and the so-called newcomers. Who are these visitors? These are poor relatives, as they would be called now; poor relatives were then, and now, residents of other Greek cities are meteks. The youngest son of that very famous Pericles was not given an inheritance, thereby the position itself, because his mother was from their other Greek city! After the Greco-Persian Wars, the Athenians stopped working, or, more precisely, it became unprestigious to work. But trading is, yes, it has become prestigious. In addition, it has become fashionable to rally at the Agora – Athenian Forum. The whole V century before the witnesses watched the decline of the Athenian school of philosophy. Quick and easy ones replaced the deep thoughts. Oratory and populism have become fashionable. The Greeks stopped appreciating whole natures and people with a core; they fell in love with populist demagogues. With the heyday of Athenian democracy, Athenians stopped literally thinking, stopped learning, and not only from philosophers; philosophers, moralists, and intellectuals were not needed for nothing (by analogy with modernity, they stopped reading books but only began to hang out in Tiktok and Twitter). All the townspeople began to hang out at the Greek theater.





Конец ознакомительного фрагмента. Получить полную версию книги.


Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию (https://www.litres.ru/chitat-onlayn/?art=68254675) на Литрес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.